Sample AI Visibility Report

Illustrative. Acme Dental Practice is fictional; figures below are representative of the shape you'd receive for a real UK dental practice. See pricing →

AI Search Visibility, Acme Dental Practice

Domain: acme-dental.example.com Niche: dentists Refreshed: 2026-05-29 09:14 UTC Confidence: 0.78

Headline numbers.

Overall Share of Model
18.0%
████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
Queries probed
5
× 5 engines
Total brand mentions
142
across the basket
Engines probed
perplexity · chatgpt · gemini · google_ai_overview · claude

Per-engine Share of Model.

Different engines surface different brands. Knowing which engine sends which queries to you tells us where to focus the fixes.

perplexity
████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
22.0%
chatgpt
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
14.0%
gemini
████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
18.0%
google_ai_overview
████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
21.0%
claude
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
16.0%

Competitor leaderboard.

Share of brand mentions across the full query basket. Two competitors are running away with the citations.

smile_collective_clinic
███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░
34.0%
the_dental_studio
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
27.0%
Acme Dental Practice ← you
████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
18.0%
city_dental_hub
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
13.0%
westgate_dental
██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
8.0%

Per-query scoreboard.

Drill into each query individually. Knowing precisely WHICH query × WHICH engine misses you tells us what to fix first.

dentists_best_private_dentist_veneers commercial

"best private dentist for veneers UK"

High-value cosmetic procedure; high LTV.

perplexity cited ×1 chatgpt not cited gemini cited ×1 google_ai_overview not cited claude not cited
dentists_invisalign_cost commercial

"how much does Invisalign cost in London"

Price-discovery; most common pre-booking research.

perplexity cited ×2 chatgpt cited ×1 gemini not cited google_ai_overview cited ×1 claude not cited
dentists_implants_reviews_near_me commercial

"dental implants reviews near me"

Local-pack + review-synthesis; leading indicator of conversion.

perplexity cited ×1 chatgpt not cited gemini cited ×1 google_ai_overview cited ×1 claude cited ×1
dentists_emergency_appointment_uk transactional

"emergency dentist same day appointment UK"

Highest-intent query; same-day need.

perplexity not cited chatgpt not cited gemini not cited google_ai_overview not cited claude not cited
dentists_safe_whitening_at_home informational

"is at-home teeth whitening safe compared to dentist"

Top-of-funnel education; builds authority for later commercial intent.

perplexity cited ×1 chatgpt not cited gemini not cited google_ai_overview not cited claude not cited

What to fix first.

Three recommendations, prioritised by predicted lift. Each cites the underlying scoring gap and the structural / content fix that closes it.

1

Emergency same-day landing page

Why this matters: Zero engines cite you for 'emergency dentist same day appointment UK', the highest-intent transactional query in your niche.

Fix: Build a dedicated /emergency-dentist page with FAQ schema; explicit 'same-day' + phone CTA above the fold; testimonial verbatims.

Predicted lift: +8 to +14 pts SoM on emergency basket

2

Invisalign cost transparency

Why this matters: Perplexity + ChatGPT + Google AI Overview already cite competitors for cost queries, but the answers are vague.

Fix: Publish an Invisalign cost-by-case-complexity table with verifiable typical-range figures. Engines preferentially cite quantified claims.

Predicted lift: +4 to +7 pts SoM on price-discovery basket

3

Structural fix on implants page

Why this matters: Gemini + Claude cite you on implants reviews because of your existing FAQ schema. ChatGPT misses because your key claims sit mid-document.

Fix: Front-load the verifiable-stat (e.g. '94% 5-year survival rate from a 2024 BDJ meta-analysis') in the first paragraph + summarise again in a closing section.

Predicted lift: +3 to +6 pts SoM on implants basket

Methodology.

Every score above traces to a peer-reviewed method + an official-API probe.

  • Share of Model (SoM) — target brand's mention count ÷ total mentions across the basket × competitive set.
  • Position-Adjusted Word Count (PAWC)Imp = Σ wordcount(s) / exp(pos(s)) per Aggarwal et al., GEO: Generative Engine Optimization, KDD 2024, arXiv 2311.09735. Up to ~40% citation-rate uplift, domain-dependent.
  • Composite VisibilityV = 0.40·Coverage + 0.30·Position + 0.30·Influence.
  • Citation ProbabilityP̂ = σ(w·features). Logistic heuristic with calibration priors; not a law.

Probes use official engine APIs, Perplexity sonar, OpenAI web search, Anthropic, Google Gemini, SerpAPI for Google AI Overviews. Never scraping.

Back to AI Visibility → Request your free report →